US Male Grand Slam Dry Spell Isn't Fritz's Responsibility to Carry

I possess a few thoughts regarding that remarks delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown was understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But come on. Suppose Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the chance to beat the top three competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is more than justified to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite delivery and concussive strength on each front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a several significant, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after break point, prolonging the run to the brink of agony. When he finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a horrendous service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to expend far too much energy to win it. Down match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was quite ironclad proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, who lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never especially seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, willing to not only express how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

  • Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
  • The American contender
  • Alex de Minaur (Aus)
  • Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

  • Jannik Sinner (It)
  • The German powerhouse
  • The rising American
  • The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {

Amy Thomas
Amy Thomas

Maya Sterling is a seasoned gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering casino trends and player strategies.